3260 papers • 126 benchmarks • 313 datasets
This task has no description! Would you like to contribute one?
(Image credit: Papersgraph)
These leaderboards are used to track progress in tumour-classification-7
No benchmarks available.
Use these libraries to find tumour-classification-7 models and implementations
No subtasks available.
The integrated model learned from multi-omics datasets outperformed those using only one type of omics data, which indicates that the complementary information from different omics datatypes provides useful insights for biomedical tasks like cancer classification.
Dense Steerable Filter CNNs (DSF-CNNs) that use group convolutions with multiple rotated copies of each filter in a densely connected framework are proposed that achieve state-of-the-art performance, with significantly fewer parameters, when applied to three different tasks in the area of computational pathology.
Two spatiotemporal models, ResNet (2+1)D and ResNet Mixed Convolution, are used to classify different types of brain tumours, and it was observed that both these models performed superior to the pure 3D convolutional model, Res net18.
In experiments, XOmiVAE explanations of deep learning-based cancer classification and clustering aligned with current domain knowledge including biological annotation and academic literature, which shows great potential for novel biomedical knowledge discovery from deep learning models.
The proposed framework for three inherently explainable classifiers (GP-UNet, GP-ShuffleUNet, and GP-ReconResNet) successfully combines high diagnostic accuracy with essential transparency, offering a promising direction for trustworthy clinical decision support.
A comparative study of CNN, CNNx2 (CNN with double the number of trainable parameters as the CNN), and CV-CNN, using seven models for two different tasks - brain tumour classification and segmentation in brain MRIs revealed that the CV- CNN models outperformed the CNN and CNNx3 models.
13 of the 14,379 genes were selected as the most metastatic prostate cancer related genes, achieving approximately 92% accuracy under cross-validation, and preliminary insights into the co-expression patterns of genes in gene co- expression networks are provided.
The present study highlights the importance of careful selection of network and input image size, and indicates that a larger number of parameters is not always better, and the best results can be achieved on smaller and more efficient networks.
The results of the authors' experiments strongly support the effectiveness of the proposed method, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of 98.7% and outcomes clearly outperform existing approaches.
Adding a benchmark result helps the community track progress.